Fraley (ID 56370) v. Tranbarger et al
| Mark Fraley |
| Kayla Tranbarger, Sean Fay, Michelle Stern, Diane Haines, Reginna Strobel, Roger Meatchtlen, Erica Brown, Patricia Amaya, Tina Stanley, Samantha Brox, Deb McAlister, Jeanne Young, Pam Barker, Kathy Crosswhite, Donalda Parker, Amanda Auble and Susan Mathes |
| 5:2016cv03143 |
| July 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Cowley |
| Eric F. Melgren |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 100 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 121 Plaintiff's Motion for Excusable Neglect on Untimely Filing. The clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. Signed by District Judge John W. Broomes on 2/7/2019. Mailed to pro se party Mark Fraley at the El Dorado Correctional Facility (Oswego) by regular mail. (mam)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER denying 99 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge (plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the pretrial order). Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/1/2018. Mailed to pro se party Mark Fraley a copy of this order and the court's summary judgment guidelines by regular mail. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 67 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 73 Motion for Special Master. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 10/26/2017. Mailed to pro se party by regular mail. (amh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
