Stewart (ID 35253) v. Norwood et al
Wayne Anthony Stewart |
Joe Norwood, James Heimgartner and Deane Donley |
5:2016cv03189 |
September 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Butler |
Julie A. Robinson |
David J. Waxse |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER denying 38 motion to return filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 1/25/2018. Mailed to pro se party by regular mail. (amh) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is granted as to Plaintiff's official-capacity claims against Defendants He imgartner and Donley, granted as to Plaintiff's individual-capacity claims against all Defendants, but denied as to Plaintiff's official-capacity claim against Defendant Norwood for injunctive relief from EDCF's policy of not paying interest earned on Plaintiff's inmate trust account.Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 09/27/2017.Mailed to pro se party Wayne Anthony Stewart by regular mail (cv) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 22 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 5/26/2017. Mailed to pro se party Wayne Anthony Stewart by regular mail. (hl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.