Kobel (ID 103958) v. Dunkle et al
| Scott Harris Kobel |
| Don Dunkle, (fnu) McGovern, Douglas County Sheriff's Office and Douglas County Jail |
| 5:2016cv03227 |
| November 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Pawnee |
| Carlos Murguia |
| David J. Waxse |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendant Don Dunkle, (first name unknown) McGovern, Douglas County Sheriff's Office, and Douglas County Jail's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is granted. Plaintiff's renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel 42 is denied. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 01/25/18. Mailed to pro se party Scott Harris Kobel by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Claim/Defense of Qualified Immunity 38 is granted. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 10/12/17. Mailed to pro se party Scott Harris Kobel by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 16 is denied without prejudice. If it becomes apparent that appointed counsel is necessary as this case further progresses, Plaintiff may renew his motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 06/14/17. Mailed to pro se party Scott Harris Kobel by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
