McCoy (ID 76894) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
| DeRon McCoy, Jr. |
| Kansas Department of Corrections, Andrew Lucht, James Gift, Jordon Mosher, Anthony McCurrie and (fnu) Acker |
| 5:2016cv03239 |
| November 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Butler |
| Sam A. Crow |
| David J. Waxse |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion to dismiss 26 is granted. The action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/10/18. Mailed to pro se party DeRon McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and a copy of the Complaint, along with this Order, to be served on the Kansas Department of Corrections, pursuant to Rule 4(j) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and sha ll prepare waiver of service forms for the remaining defendants, pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all to be served at no cost to Plaintiff absent a finding by the Court that Plaintiff is able to pay such costs. Plaintiff's motion for issuance of summons and waiver of service 11 is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 07/13/17. Mailed to pro se party Deron McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
