Powell v. Laurie et al
| Darren L. Powell |
| Jack Laurie, Travis Wright, Crystal Martin, Amber Martin, Tammy Jones, Charles Thomas, Tom Enzbrenner, Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe and John/Jane Does |
| 5:2016cv03251 |
| December 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Atchison |
| Sam A. Crow |
| David J. Waxse |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to reopen this matter 26 is denied. Signed by U.S. Court District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/09/18. Mailed to pro se party Darren Lee Powell by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer 21 is denied as moot. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/20/17. Mailed to pro se party Darren L. Powell by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
22
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Within twenty (20) days of receipt of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause to the Honorable Sam A. Crow why Plaintiff's complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 13 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 08/11/17. Mailed to pro se party Darren L. Powell by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
