Stevenson v. KVC et al
| Aaron Michael Stevenson |
| KVC, Jason Hooper, Megan Nelson and Brittany Smith |
| 5:2017cv03027 |
| February 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Douglas |
| Sam A. Crow |
| David J. Waxse |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/29/17. Mailed to pro se party Aaron Michael Stevenson by regular mail (msb)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The clerk of the court shall issue summons to defendant KVC and waivers to the individual defendants named in the complaint. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/08/17. Mailed to pro se party Aaron Michael Stevenson by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted. Plaintiff is advised that he remains obligated to pay the $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel 6 is denie d. Plaintiff is granted to and including August 17, 2017, to supplement the complaint with any copies of any available documents relevant to his claim of a violation of his civil rights. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 07/17/17. Mailed to pro se party Aaron Michael Stevenson by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
