Dale (ID 91014) v. Heimgartner et al
| Christopher Michael Dale |
| James Heimgartner, (fnu) Bos, John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3), John Doe (4), Jeff Cunningham, John Doe (5) and Joe Norwood |
| 5:2017cv03057 |
| April 3, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Butler |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/23/18. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Michael Dale by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until November 26, 2017, to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why plaintiff's complaint should not be dismissed. Until November 26, 2017, plaintiff may file a complete and proper Amended Complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Plaintiff's motions to file under seal and gag order all defendants 2 , for preliminary injunction 4 , to appoint counsel 9 , requesting a ruling on the motion for preliminary injunction 11 , and requesting a telephone hearing on his motion 12 are denied. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/27/17. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Michael Dale by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
