Garcia (ID 6002627) v. Shaw et al
Ray Floyd Garcia, Jr. |
Susan A. Shaw, Malty J. Martin and William M. Van Scoter |
5:2017cv03181 |
October 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Butler |
Sam A. Crow |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/20/18. Mailed to pro se party Ray Floyd Garcia, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until February 28, 2018, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/31/18. Mailed to pro se party Ray Floyd Garcia, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until December 12, 2017, in which to pay the remaining $395.00 of the filing fee in this case. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without pr ejudice and without additional prior notice. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 2 is denied without prejudice. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/28/17. Mailed to pro se party Ray Floyd Garcia, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.