Martini v. Cline et al
||Scott Michael Martini
||Sam Cline, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and (fnu) (lnu) (2)
||October 25, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Kansas
||Sam A. Crow
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 10, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/10/18. Mailed to pro se party Scott Michael Martini by regular mail. (smnd)
|December 1, 2017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint, for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief 3 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend his co mplaint is granted and the Clerk is directed to docket Plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint at Doc. 3-1. Plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief are denied. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejud ice. Plaintiff's request to waive the initial partial filing fee 6 is granted. Plaintiff is granted until December 29, 2017, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff 039;s Amended Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until December 29, 2017, in which to file a complete and proper Second Amended Complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/01/17. Mailed to pro se party Scott Michael Martini by regular mail. (smnd)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?