Collins v. Norwood et al
Justin Jade Collins |
Joe Norwood, Sam Cline, Melissa Waldrock, Colette Winkelbauer, Doug Burris and Andrew Lucht |
5:2017cv03189 |
October 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Leavenworth |
Sam A. Crow |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion to dismiss 25 is granted. This action is hereby dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants' motion to stay discovery 27 is denied as moot. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 06/28/18. Mailed to pro se party Justin Jade Collins by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 3 is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare waiver of service forms for the defendants, pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil P rocedure, to be served at no cost to Plaintiff absent a finding by the Court that Plaintiff is able to pay such costs. The Clerk of the Court shall enter the Kansas Department of Corrections as an interested party on the docket for the limited purpo se of preparing the Martinez Report. Upon the filing of that report, the KDOC may move for termination from this action. See Order for Details. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/07/17. Mailed to pro se party Justin Jade Collins by regular mail. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.