Clervrain v. United States of America et al
| Manetirony Clervrain |
| United States of America and Bureau of Prisons |
| 5:2017cv03194 |
| October 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Amending After Filing All Motions for Discovery in Such Complex Controversies 57 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Consideration and Oppositions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, 52(b) , 59, and 60 58 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Continuation of Circumstancesand Retaliation by the Defendants Transferred 59 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Similarity (FOIA) Circumstances as Evidence in Supporting the Case 60 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Constitutionality Claims and Defenses 61 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Permissible Intervention for the (FOIA) Controversial Allegations 62 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Oppos ition the Defendants Omnibus Responses and Bad Faith Intent 63 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the (BOP) for Legal Materials as an Indigent Inmate Against Apartheid 64 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion as Notice for the Defend ants Avoiding the Allegation of "Criminal Enterprises" in Responses 65 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Placement in Home Confinement and Exceptional Circumstances to Litigate the Controversies 69 is denied. Plaintiff's M otion for the Defendant(s) Failure to Consider Circumstantial Evidence in the (FOIA) Allegations 70 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel for Efficient Law Library 71 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Exposure Under Degradment of Co nfinement Based Upon My Classification 72 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the (DSCC) for Transfer to a Facility Where Resources Applicable to Litigate 73 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis [75 ] is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Rights and Permissible Intervention 76 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Opposing Premature Summary Judgment, in the Alternative Frivolous, or Not Being Patient 77 is denied. Plaintiff's Motio n for Judicial Appellate Panel and Controversies 78 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for the Court to Perform Its Duties and Interest of Justice 79 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Public Disclosure and Trade Secret Claims 81 is deni ed. Plaintiff's Motion for Evidence and Fear of Death Claim 82 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Evidence and Manipulate Rates in the Market 83 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Undeveloped Facts and Independent Counsel 84 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Deny Access to the Courts by Illegal Contract or Negligence for Evidence and Interest of Justice 85 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Interest of Justice and Fear Liability Claim 86 is denied. Plainti ff's Motion for Jury Demands and Interest of Justice 88 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Evidence and Causation for Withheld Evidence 91 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Exceptional Circumstances and Demand for Motions Copies F iled 92 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for International Concerns 93 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Equitable Tolling and Ulterior Motive Claims 94 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Public Interest Concerns and Interest of Justice 95 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Opposing the Defendant(s) Restrictions 97 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Evidence and for Jurisdictional Defects 98 is denied. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response 74 is denied as moot. Defendants' Motion for Filing Restrictions 89 is denied. Defendants are relieved of responding to any future motions filed by Plaintiff unless ordered to do so by the Court, and any additional motions filed by Plaintiff are subject to summary dismissal. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/08/19. Mailed to pro se party Manetirony Clervrain by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL ENTERED: Defendants' motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment 28 , is granted. This matter is dismissed. All of Plaintiff's pending motions 19 , 25 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 50 and 53 are denied as moot. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/19/18. Mailed to pro se party Manetirony Clervrain by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The Clerk of Court shall effectuate service of summons pursuant to Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at no cost to Plaintiff. Plaintiff's claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act is dismissed for f ailure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 11 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for intervention 12 is denied. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/28/18. Mailed to pro se party Manetirony Clervrain by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 8 is granted to the extent he may proceed without the prepayment of the $10.50 initial partial filing fee assessed by the Court in its Order of November 30, 2017. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the full fee as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/15/17. Mailed to pro se party Manetirony Clervrain by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including January 8, 2018, in which to show good cause, in writing, why Plaintiff's FTCA claim and FOIA fee waiver claim should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's motion to appoint coun sel 3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to appoint marshal to effectuate service 4 is denied without prejudice. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/08/17. Mailed to pro se party Manetirony Clervrain by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
