Harris (ID 77834) v. Kansas, State of

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Kansas District Court Harris (ID 77834) v. Kansas, State of

Harris (ID 77834) v. Kansas, State of

Petitioner:	Lance J. Harris
Respondent:	Kansas, State of
Case Number:	5:2017cv03195
Filed:	November 8, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office:	Topeka Office
County:	Leavenworth
Presiding Judge:	Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 31, 2018	Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Petitioner is granted to and including June 21, 2018, to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/31/2018. Mailed to Petitioner Lance J. Harris by regular mail. (ht)
November 13, 2017	Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting petitioner to and including December 13, 2017, to advise the Court (1) whether the state district court has conducted the hearing ordered by the Kansas Court of Appeals; if so, the outcome of that hearing; and, if petit ioner did not obtain relief, whether he is seeking appellate review of that decision; and (2) whether he intends to seek relief in the state courts on his unexhausted claims or whether he prefers to amend the petition and proceed on the exhausted claims. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/13/2017. Mailed to pro se party Lance J. Harris by regular mail. (ms)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 31, 2018

Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Petitioner is granted to and including June 21, 2018, to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/31/2018. Mailed to Petitioner Lance J. Harris by regular mail. (ht)

November 13, 2017

Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting petitioner to and including December 13, 2017, to advise the Court (1) whether the state district court has conducted the hearing ordered by the Kansas Court of Appeals; if so, the outcome of that hearing; and, if petit ioner did not obtain relief, whether he is seeking appellate review of that decision; and (2) whether he intends to seek relief in the state courts on his unexhausted claims or whether he prefers to amend the petition and proceed on the exhausted claims. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/13/2017. Mailed to pro se party Lance J. Harris by regular mail. (ms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris (ID 77834) v. Kansas, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Lance J. Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Kansas, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?