Ranes (10514) v. Murphy et al
Chad Eugene Ranes |
Brian Murphy and Mike Jewel |
5:2017cv03196 |
November 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Allen |
Sam A. Crow |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion to dismiss 17 is granted. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 06/11/19. Mailed to pro se party Chad Eugene Ranes by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Counts 2 and 3 of the amended complaint are dismissed. The court denies 9 Motion for Subpoena of Body Cameras and Pod Cameras; grants 10 Motion for subpoena of kiosk grievances and medical request; denies 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 2/5/2019. Mailed to Plaintiff Chad Eugene Ranes by regular mail. (ht) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is directed to submit an amended complaint that corrects the deficiencies. The failure to submit an amended complaint may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. On or before April 27, 2018, plaintiff shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. Plaintiff's motion for hearing date 2 is denied. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/28/18. Mailed to pro se party Chad Eugene Ranes by regular mail. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.