Ellison v. Ladner
Plaintiff: Todd Ellison
Defendant: Christine M.T. Ladner
Case Number: 5:2017cv04025
Filed: March 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Sedgwick
Presiding Judge: Daniel D. Crabtree
Presiding Judge: James P. O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 3/20/2018. (ht)
May 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting 8 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/10/2017. (srj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellison v. Ladner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd Ellison
Represented By: Larry G. Michel
Represented By: Christianna Nicole Pruden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine M.T. Ladner
Represented By: M. J. Willoughby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?