Vaughn (ID 106849) v. Schnurr
Petitioner: Reginald Vaughn
Respondent: Dan Schnurr
Case Number: 5:2018cv03004
Filed: January 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Reno
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Petitioner is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and is directed to submit the $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. Petitioner is granted to and including October 11, 2018, to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/11/18. Mailed to pro se party Reginald Vaughn by regular mail. (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vaughn (ID 106849) v. Schnurr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Vaughn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dan Schnurr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?