Ridley (ID 0117475) v. Brownback et al
Anthony Earl Ridley |
Sam Brownback, Governor Constituent Services Office, Joe Norwood, Cindy Vanpay, (fnu) Agnew, Kansas Department of Corrections, Kansas, State of, (fnu) (lnu), (fnu) Putman, (fnu) Gaskill and J. George |
5:2018cv03060 |
March 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Leavenworth |
Sam A. Crow |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Void Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment 13 is denied. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/10/19. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Earl Ridley by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 1/4/19. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Earl Ridley by regular mail (msb) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until January 2, 2019, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Amended Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until January 2, 2019, in which to file a complete and proper second amended complaint to cure all thedeficiencies. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/14/18. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Earl Ridley by regular mail. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.