McCoy (ID 76894) v. Burris et al
| DeRon McCoy, Jr. |
| Douglas Burris, Dan Schnurr, M. A. Nickels, M. Hamby, J. Zolam, P. Keen, N. Turner, John Doe (1), Richard Roe, John Doe (2) and John Roe |
| 5:2018cv03077 |
| March 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Butler |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 32 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; denying 36 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint & granting 28 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 9/22/20. Mailed to pro se party Deron McCoy by regular mail (msb)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Douglas Burris, Michael Hamby, Patti Keen, Mike Nickels, Dan Schnurr, and Jennifer Zolman's Motion to Stay Discovery and Related Rule 26 Activities (Doc. 31 ) is granted. All pretrial proceedings in this case are stayed until further order of the court. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 04/10/20. Mailed to pro se party DeRon McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff shall have until October 15, 2019, to show good cause why Defendants N. Turner, John Doe and Richard Roe should not be dismissed for failure to effectuate service on these defendants. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/01/19. Mailed to pro se party DeRon McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The Clerk of Court shall serve Defendants under the e-service pilot program in effect with the Kansas Department of Corrections ("KDOC"). Upon the electronic filing of the Waiver of Service Executed pursuant to the e-service program, KDOC shall have sixty (60) days to prepare the Martinez Report. Upon the filing of that report, the AG/Defendants shall have an additional sixty (60) days to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Officials responsib le for the operation of HCF are directed to undertake a review of the subject matter of the Amended Complaint. Upon completion of the review, a written report shall be compiled which shall be filed with the Court and served on Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall enter KDOC as an interested party on the docket for the limited purpose of preparing the Martinez Report. Upon the filing of that report, KDOC may move for termination from this action. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/14/19. Mailed to pro se party DeRon McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/05/18. Mailed to pro se party Deron McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion requesting issuance of waiver of service and summonses on Defendants 4 is premature and therefore denied. Plaintiff is granted until September 4, 2018, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until September 4, 2018, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/03/18. Mailed to pro se party DeRon McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
