Florez v. Wyandotte County Police Department
| Jesus Florez |
| Wyandotte County Police Department |
| Kansas City Kansas Police Department |
| 5:2018cv03182 |
| July 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Butler |
| Sam A Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RETURN mail received re #6 Memorandum and Order addressed to Plaintiff Jesus Florez (Return to Sender/No Longer at This Address); Remailed on 09/04/18 to Plaintiff Florez at Wyandotte County Detention Center (smnd) |
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 9/7/2018. Receipt number T4631012117, in the amount of $ 16.00. (mls) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT (see pages 2-3) to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Jesus Florez (smnd) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Jesus Florez, #161611: now at Wyandotte County Detention Center, 710 N. 7th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101 (smnd) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Copies of the 5 Order and #6 Memorandum and Order were remailed to Plaintiff Jesus Florez at Wyandotte County Detention Center; a copy of the 5 Order was mailed to the Finance Office at Wyandotte County Detention Center. (smnd) |
| Filing 7 RETURN mail received re 5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed to Plaintiff Jesus Florez (Return to Sender/No Longer at This Address); Not Remailed (smnd) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The Clerk of the Court shall enter KCKPD as an interested party on the docket for the limited purpose of preparing the Martinez Report. Upon the filing of that report, KCKPD may move for termination from this action. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/27/18. Mailed to pro se party Jesus Florez and Kansas City Kansas Police Department by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 5
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis #2 & #4 are granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $16.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted fourteen (14) days from receipt of this order to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/21/18. Mailed to pro se party Jesus Florez by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jesus Florez (Attachments: #1 Inmate Balance History Report; #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Jesus Florez by regular mail. Response deadline 8/29/2018. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jesus Florez (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Jesus Florez (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
