Young v. Revell et al
| Timothy Doyle Young |
| Department of Justice and Sara Revell |
| 5:2018cv03215 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT regarding Order #4 dismissing matter without prejudice. ***Terminating Case. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/03/18. Mailed to pro se party Timothy Doyle Young by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to submit the filing fee as directed. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/03/18. Mailed to pro se party Timothy Doyle Young by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Timothy Doyle Young (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including September 21, 2018, to submit the $400.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that time will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/21/18. Mailed to pro se party Timothy Doyle Young by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Timothy Doyle Young (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
