Hayes (ID 58516) v. Kansas, State of et al
Michael S. Hayes |
Kansas, State of, Phillip Lacey, Martin Asher and Linda Mock |
5:2018cv03230 |
September 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Sam A Crow |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until November 26, 2018, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) should not be dismissed. Signed by Senior U.S. District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/26/18. Mailed to pro se party Michael S. Hayes by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 4 ORDER finding as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/26/18. Mailed to pro se party Michael S. Hayes by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
FILING FEE PAID in the amount of $400, receipt number W4631016162. (mam) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mailed to pro se party Michael S. Hayes by regular mail. Response deadline 10/5/2018. (smnd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael S. Hayes (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Michael S. Hayes (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.