McCarty (ID 6010350) v. Cline
| Edrick McCarty |
| Kansas, State of and Sam Cline |
| 5:2018cv03283 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT regarding Order #2 dismissing successive application for habeas corpus. ***Terminating Case. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/21/18. Mailed to pro se party Edrick McCarty by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ENTERED: This successive application for habeas corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. No certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/21/18. Mailed to pro se party Edrick McCarty by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Edrick McCarty (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Notice sent to Petitioner Edrick McCarty reminding him that he is incarcerated in a facility with mandatory electronic filing and should follow instructions available at the facility for transmitting pleadings electronically to the court. (smnd) |
| FILING FEE PAID in the amount of $5.00, receipt number T4631012321 (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
