Bell v. Ratz et al
| Steven Bell |
| O. Orellana, (fnu) Bryant, (fnu) (lnu), N. C. English and Donald Ratz |
| 5:2018cv03285 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. Plaintiff's motion to expedite #3 is denied. Plaintiff is granted until February 4, 2019, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until February 4, 2019, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/15/19. Mailed to pro se party Steven Bell by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Steven Bell: now at 1005 NE Jefferson Avenue, Peoria, Illinois 60613 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite by Plaintiff Steven Bell (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Steven Bell (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Steven Bell (Attachments: #1 Letter to Judge Sam A. Crow; #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
