Waterman v. Tippie et al
Brian Michael Waterman |
Lara (lnu), Michelle Tippie and Danny Davis |
5:2018cv03295 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Sam A Crow |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 01/24/2019. Receipt number T4631012499, in the amount of $ 10.00. (jal) |
Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: On or before February 4, 2019, plaintiff shall submit an initial partial filing fee of $10.00 to the clerk of the court. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without additional prior notice to the plaintiff. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/02/19. Mailed to pro se party Brian Michael Waterman by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 4 SWORN AFFIDAVIT re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Michael Waterman (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Brian Michael Waterman by regular mail. Response deadline 1/14/2019. (smnd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brian Michael Waterman (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Brian Michael Waterman (Attachments: #1 Envelopes) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.