Dodson v. Flying Dove, Inc. d/b/a IHOP
Plaintiff: Emori Dodson
Defendant: Flying Dove, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2018cv04034
Filed: May 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Ellis
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Presiding Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. See order for details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/30/19. (msb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dodson v. Flying Dove, Inc. d/b/a IHOP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emori Dodson
Represented By: Larry G. Michel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flying Dove, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph H. Cassell
Represented By: David Prelle Eron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?