Page v. Commandant

Petitioner: Jeffery T. Page
Respondent: Commandant
Case Number: 5:2019cv03020
Filed: February 11, 2019
Court: Kansas District Court
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2019 2 MOTION for attorney John N. Maher to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4710145.) by Petitioner Jeffery T. Page (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B)(Joseph, Christopher)
February 11, 2019 FILING FEE PAID in the amount of $5.00, receipt number T4631012558 (smnd)
February 11, 2019 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Jeffery T. Page (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Page v. Commandant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commandant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffery T. Page
Represented By: Diane L. Bellquist
Represented By: Christopher Michael Joseph
Represented By: Carrie Elizabeth Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?