Clervrain v. Brownback
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant: Samuel Dale Brownback
Case Number: 5:2019cv03040
Filed: March 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Indigency Financial Burdens Act by Plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain (smnd)
March 15, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Expanding the Nationality Choice Act by Plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain (smnd)
March 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain (Attachments: #1 Resident Account Summary) (smnd)
March 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clervrain v. Brownback
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Dale Brownback
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?