Hinshaw v. Teeter et al
| Scott Douglas Hinshaw |
| Sam A. Crow, Holly L. Teeter and Richard D. Rogers |
| 5:2019cv03047 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT regarding Order #4 dismissing action without prejudice. ***Terminating Case. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 04/16/19. Mailed to pro se party Scott Douglas Hinshaw by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 4
ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/16/19. Mailed to pro se party Scott Douglas Hinshaw by regular mail.(smnd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Truth by Plaintiff Scott Douglas Hinshaw. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until April 12, 2019, to submit the $400.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by Senior U.S. District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/27/19. Mailed to pro se party Scott Douglas Hinshaw by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Scott Douglas Hinshaw (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
