Rodriguez (ID 30732) v. West et al
| Raymond Rodriguez |
| (fnu) McCord, (fnu) West and Brandt Helsel |
| 5:2019cv03118 |
| July 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE (titled Motion to Proceed) by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez re #4 Notice and Order to Show Cause. (smnd) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to #3 Notice of Deficiency by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez. (smnd) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: On or before August 12, 2019, plaintiff shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/12/19. Mailed to pro se party Raymond Rodriguez by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Raymond Rodriguez by regular mail. Response deadline 8/7/2019. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Raymond Rodriguez. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
