Norris v. Commandant
| Jack K. Norris |
| Commandant |
| 5:2020cv03066 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL by Kathryn E. Sheedy and ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF SUBSTITUTED COUNSEL by Jared S. Maag on behalf of Commandant (Maag, Jared) |
Filing 7
ORDER ENTERED: Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #6 ) is granted. The deadline for Respondent to file the Answer and Return or other responsive pleading is extended to May 14, 2020. The deadline for Petitioner to file a Traverse is extended to June 15, 2020. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 03/17/20. (smnd)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Commandant (Sheedy, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of John N. Maher for Jack K. Norris pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Unless already registered, pro hac vice counsel should register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a CM/ECF Electronic Filing Registration Form at http://www.ksd.uscourts.gov. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/28/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ses)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING REGISTRATION FORM of John N. Maher re motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #3 by Petitioner Jack K. Norris.(gw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for attorney John N. Maher to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5073864.) by Petitioner Jack K. Norris (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B)(Joseph, Christopher) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent is required to show cause on or before March 30, 2020, why the writ should not be granted. Petitioner is granted until April 29, 2020, to file a traverse thereto. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/27/20. (smnd)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Jack K. Norris. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B) (smnd) |
| FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $5.00, receipt number T4631013633. (kkw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Norris v. Commandant | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Commandant | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn E. Sheedy |
| Represented By: | Jared S. Maag |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jack K. Norris | |
| Represented By: | Diane L. Bellquist |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Joseph |
| Represented By: | Carrie Elizabeth Parker |
| Represented By: | John N. Maher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
