Kraus (ID 68935) v. Meyers et al
Plaintiff: Michael Lloyd Kraus
Defendant: Jeff Zmuda and Shannon Meyers
Case Number: 5:2020cv03283
Filed: November 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2021 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 1/6/2021. Receipt number T4631014389, in the amount of $ 284.93. (mls)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $12.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including December 7, 2020, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/23/20. Mailed to pro se party Michael Lloyd Kraus by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
November 19, 2020 Filing 6 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kansas Department of Corrections for Plaintiff Michael Lloyd Kraus. (smnd)
November 18, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Michael Lloyd Kraus by regular mail. Response deadline 12/18/2020. (smnd)
November 18, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Lloyd Kraus. (smnd)
November 13, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 Affidavit. Mailed to pro se party Michael Lloyd Kraus by regular mail. Response deadline 12/14/2020. (jal)
November 13, 2020 Filing 2 IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Michael Lloyd Kraus. (jal)
November 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Michael Lloyd Kraus. (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kraus (ID 68935) v. Meyers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Zmuda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shannon Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Lloyd Kraus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?