Cortes-Gomez v. USA
| Marco Antonio Cortes-Gomez |
| USA |
| 5:2020cv04052 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| James P O'Hara |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ORDER. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/23/19. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (mls) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence. This entry is a duplicate of the entry that was made in criminal case number 16-40091-01; the motion was refiled in the civil case for reference purposes. Response deadline 9/24/2020 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (mls) |
| MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all further proceedings as this case relates to Case. No. 19-2491, in re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 9/10/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mls) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: ALL FUTURE DOCKETING TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 16-40091-01-DDC. (mls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
