Ngiendo v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
| Quinn Ngiendo |
| Unknown Others, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv04065 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail upon Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. served on 12/2/2020, answer due 12/23/2020. (mls) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (issued to US Marshal for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk's office will issue a summons for defendant Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. based upon the information provided in Ngiendo's Amended Complaint (ECF 10). Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/16/2020. Mailed to pro se party Quinn Ngiendo by regular mail. (mls)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #6 Order to Show Cause. In response to the court's October 26 Order to Show Cause, plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as the defendant rather than an LLC. Plaintiff alleges that defendant is a Delaware corporation headquartered in New Jersey. Because plaintiff has now alleged complete diversity between the parties, the undersigned will not recommend dismissal of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/16/2020. Mailed to pro se party Quinn Ngiendo by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ks)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Quinn Ngiendo. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (mls) |
| Filing 9 (NOTE: Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy.) FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Quinn Ngiendo. (mls) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Quinn Ngiendo. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Hospital Lien) (mls) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT returned re #6 Order to Show Cause and #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis addressed to Quinn Ngiendo. (mls) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the undersigned should not recommend that the district judge dismiss this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 11/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/26/20. (msb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for refiling by 11/9/20. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/26/20. (msb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Quinn Ngiendo. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (jsh) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Quinn Ngiendo - trial to be held in Topeka. (jsh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Quinn Ngiendo. (jsh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by Quinn Ngiendo. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
