Kidwell v. Johnson County Adult Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Lee Kidwell
Defendant: Johnson County Adult Detention Center and Johnson County, Kansas
Case Number: 5:2021cv03013
Filed: January 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw complaint (ECF No. #4 ) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/29/21. Mailed to pro se party Ronald Lee Kidwell by regular mail. (smnd)
January 29, 2021 ***Civil Case Terminated. (smnd)
January 22, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw by Plaintiff Ronald Lee Kidwell. (Attachments: #1 List of Pending Cases, #2 Envelope) (smnd)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees #2 is granted because plaintiff's trust fund account statement shows that he has insufficient funds to pay an initial partial filing fee. Notwithstanding this grant of leave, plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee and is hereby assessed $350.00. Plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the filing fees are paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/12/21. Mailed to pro se party Ronald Lee Kidwell by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
January 8, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ronald Lee Kidwell. (Attachments: #1 Resident Transactions) (jal)
January 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ronald Lee Kidwell. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope) (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kidwell v. Johnson County Adult Detention Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Lee Kidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson County Adult Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson County, Kansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?