Brown v. Hudson et al
Petitioner: Dymond C. Brown
Respondent: Department of Justice and (fnu) Hudson
Case Number: 5:2021cv03042
Filed: February 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ENTERED: The court, upon review of the traverse, finds petitioner is not entitled to relief in this matter. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 03/10/21. Mailed to pro se party Dymond C. Brown by regular mail. (smnd)
March 8, 2021 Filing 9 TRAVERSE by Petitioner Dymond C. Brown re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
March 5, 2021 Filing 8 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #7 dismissing petition for habeas corpus. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 03/05/21. Mailed to pro se party Dymond C. Brown by regular mail. (smnd)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The petition for habeas corpus is dismissed and all relief is denied. Petitioner's motion for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 03/05/21. Mailed to pro se party Dymond C. Brown by regular mail. (smnd)
February 26, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Department of Justice, (fnu) Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Boudreaux Declaration, #2 Attachment 2 - Kerivan Declaration)(Sinclair, Luke)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent is required to show cause on or before February 26, 2021, why the writ should not be granted. No extension will be allowed. Petitioner shall have until March 2, 2021, to file a traverse thereto. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/11/21. Mailed to pro se party Dymond C. Brown by regular mail; e-mailed to U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas. (smnd)
February 11, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Dymond C. Brown by regular mail. Response deadline 3/15/2021. (smnd)
February 11, 2021 Filing 3 Letter to Clerk of the Court from Petitioner Dymond C. Brown. (smnd)
February 11, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Emergency Injunction by Petitioner Dymond C. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
February 11, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Dymond C. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Hudson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Justice
Represented By: Luke P. Sinclair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: (fnu) Hudson
Represented By: Luke P. Sinclair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dymond C. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?