Francis v. Cline et al
John F. Francis |
Derek Schmidt and Sam Cline |
5:2021cv03079 |
March 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Sam A Crow |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #4 ) is granted. The deadline for Respondents to file an Answer and Return is July 19, 2021. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/13/21. (smnd) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Respondents Sam Cline, Derek Schmidt (Ailslieger, Kristafer) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent shall show cause within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order why the writ should not be granted. Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days after receipt by him of a copy of Respondent's answer and return to file a traverse thereto. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/19/21. E-mailed to Attorney General for the State of Kansas. (smnd) |
Filing 2 AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner John F. Francis. (smnd) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner John F. Francis. (Attachments: #1 Opinion Exhibits) (smnd) |
HABEAS FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number T4631014598. (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.