Hurley v. Johnston
Cornell Hurley, Jr. |
(fnu) Johnston |
5:2021cv03114 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 TRAVERSE by Petitioner Cornell Hurley, Jr. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents and Table of Authorities, #2 Exhibits 1-20, #3 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 8 ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner has shown good cause why his Petition should not be dismissed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 06/15/21. Mailed to pro se party Cornell Hurley, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE (signed Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) re #3 Order to Show Cause by Petitioner Cornell Hurley, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by (fnu) Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Attach. A - Results of Trial, #2 Attach. B - GCMO No. 19, #3 Attach. C - Gessner Declaration, #4 Attach. D - Harms Declaration)(Maag, Jared) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Petitioner is granted until June 21, 2021, in which to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The deadline for Respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted is extended to July 6, 2021. The deadline for Petitioner to file a traverse thereto, admitting or denying under oath all factual allegations therein contained, is extended to August 6, 2021. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 06/03/21. Mailed to pro se party Cornell Hurley, Jr. by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jared S. Maag on behalf of (fnu) Johnston (Maag, Jared) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent is required to show cause on or before June 11, 2021, why the writ should not be granted. Petitioner is granted until July 12, 2021, to file a traverse thereto. Petitioner shall submit a signed Petition that complies with the Court's rules by May 28, 2021. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 05/11/21. Mailed to pro se party Cornwell Hurley, Jr. by regular mail; e-mailed to U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas. (smnd) |
HABEAS FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number T4631014769. (jsh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Cornell Hurley, Jr. by regular mail. Response deadline 6/2/2021. (smnd) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Cornell Hurley, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hurley v. Johnston | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Cornell Hurley, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: (fnu) Johnston | |
Represented By: | Jared S. Maag |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.