Thompson v. Rogers et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Thompson
Defendant: Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman, (fnu) Niecko, (fnu) Mackey and (fnu) Harlty
Case Number: 5:2021cv03197
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2021 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #9 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
October 12, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
October 12, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson, #15318-031: now at USP - Leavenworth, P.O. Box 1000, Leavenworth, Kansas 66048. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
September 24, 2021 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 9/24/2021. Receipt number T4631015097, in the amount of $ 90.00. (jsh)
September 17, 2021 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Doc. #6 ) is granted. The deadline for Plaintiff to submit his initial partial filing fee is extended to October 15, 2021. Plaintiff is granted until October 15, 2021, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Signed by Senior U.S. District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/17/21. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Thompson by regular mail. (smnd)
September 15, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
September 13, 2021 Filing 5 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson re (Doc. 4) Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $90.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including September 14, 2021, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/31/21. Mailed to pro se party Anthony Thompson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
August 30, 2021 Filing 3 Letter to Clerk of the Court from Plaintiff Anthony Thompson. (smnd)
August 30, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Summary) (smnd)
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Anthony Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Rogers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Roemich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Spellman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Niecko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Mackey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Harlty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?