Stringer v. Zmuda et al
| David G. Stringer |
| Jeff Zmuda, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #3, John Doe #4 and John Doe #5 |
| 5:2021cv03256 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #4 dismissing plaintiff's 1983 complaint. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 12/06/21. Mailed to pro se party David G. Stringer by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's 1983 complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief, and his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/06/21. Mailed to pro se party David G. Stringer by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David G. Stringer. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff David G. Stringer. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, Kansas, filed by Plaintiff David G. Stringer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
