Hughes (ID 105577) v. Cory et al
Plaintiff: Dashawn Hughes
Defendant: Paul Cory, Cory Paul and Bobby Gray
Case Number: 5:2021cv03281
Filed: December 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2022 Filing 6 JUDGMENT regarding Order #5 dismissing matter without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 01/31/22. Mailed to pro se party Deshawn Hughes by regular mail. (smnd)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. This matter is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with Court orders. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/31/22. Mailed to pro se party Deshawn Hughes by regular mail. (smnd)
January 10, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: A copy of the #4 Order to Show Cause was remailed to Plaintiff Dashawn Hughes at Hutchinson Correctional Facility. (smnd)
January 10, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Pursuant to the Kansas Department of Corrections, Plaintiff Dashawn Hughes has been at the Hutchinson Correctional Facility since December 21, 2021; therefore, his address has been updated on the docket sheet. (smnd)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until January 21, 2022, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/07/22. Mailed to pro se party Deshawn Hughes by regular mail. (smnd)
December 7, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Dashawn Hughes by regular mail. Response deadline 1/6/2022. (smnd)
December 7, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dashawn Hughes. (smnd)
December 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Hughes. (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes (ID 105577) v. Cory et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Cory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cory Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dashawn Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?