Harsay v. Luckert et al
Plaintiff: Edina Harsay
Defendant: Melissa Taylor Standridge, Marla J. Luckert, Evelyn Z. Wilson, Dan Biles, Eric S. Rosen and Keynen Wall, Jr.
Case Number: 5:2021cv04017
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Angel D Mitchell
Referring Judge: Kathryn H Vratil
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER sustaining, for substantially the reasons stated in the motion, #8 Motion For Extension Of Time to file Objection to Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 5/10/2021. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/27/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as)
April 23, 2021 MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #8 Second MOTION for extension of time to file Objection to R. & R.. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (ks)
April 22, 2021 Filing 8 Second MOTION for extension of time to file Objection to R. & R. by Plaintiff Edina Harsay. (Harsay, Edina)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER sustaining #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File. On or before April 26, 2021, plaintiff may file objections to the Order Granting Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis And Report And Recommendations (Doc. #4). Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/9/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (heo)
April 8, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file Objection to R. & R. by Plaintiff Edina Harsay (Harsay, Edina )
April 8, 2021 MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #6 MOTION for extension of time to file Objection to R. & R.. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (ks)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 3/29/2021. Mailed to pro se party Edina Harsay by regular mail and by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7010 2780 0003 1928 1045. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry. See Docket Entry #4 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for a copy of the order.) (jal)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Edina Harsay. Objections to R&R due by 4/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 3/29/2021. Mailed to pro se party Edina Harsay by regular mail and by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7010 2780 0003 1928 1045. (jal)
March 4, 2021 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Plaintiff Edina Harsay is a registered pro se participant with E-Filing & ECF Notifications. (gw)
March 1, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Edina Harsay. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (jsh)
March 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Edina Harsay. (jsh)
March 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by Edina Harsay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harsay v. Luckert et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Taylor Standridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marla J. Luckert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evelyn Z. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Biles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric S. Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keynen Wall, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edina Harsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?