Das v. Kansas State University et al
| Sanjoy Das and Sanjoy Das, Ph.D. |
| Kansas State University, Kansas State University of Agriculture and Applied Science and Kansas Board of Regents |
| 5:2021cv04044 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| James P O'Hara |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Sanjoy Das - trial to be held in Topeka. (Rombold, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Sanjoy Das. (Rombold, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Topeka ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5544025.), filed by Sanjoy Das. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Right To Sue)(Rombold, Peter) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
