Allen v. Evergy, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mike Allen
Defendant: Evergy, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2021cv04068
Filed: October 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Gwynne E Birzer
Referring Judge: Kathryn H Vratil
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/15/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen by regular mail. (ca)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's Objection To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #7 ) filed October 15, 2021 is OVERRULED. The Court adopts in its entirety Judge Birzer's Report And Recommendation (Doc. #6 ) filed October 7, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Civil Complaint (Doc. #1 ) filed October 1, 2021 is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion To Relieve Gwynne E. Birzer FromThis Case (Doc. #12 ) filed November 6, 2021 is OVERRULED as moot. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 11/15/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen by regular mail. (ca)
November 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Recusal (titled "Motion to Relieve Gwynne E. Birzer from this Case") by Plaintiff Mike Allen (jsh)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #10 Plaintiff Mike Allen's Motion to Direct Complaint to Another Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 11/5/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen, 1301 S. Ida, Wichita, KS 67211 by regular mail. (kf)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to direct complaint to another judge by Plaintiff Mike Allen (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (msb)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Having carefully considered the Objection To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #7 ) filed on October 15, 2021, the Court adopts in full the recommendation by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to state an actionable claim for relief. If plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he shall file a motion no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 29, 2021, in compliance with D. Kan. Rule 15.1(a). If plaintiff does not timely file such a motion, this action will be dismissed with prejudice, without further notice. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 10/21/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7012 3460 0000 8262 3114.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT returned re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS addressed to Mike Allen. (ca)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Mike Allen(msb)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Mike Allen's claims be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Objections to R&R due by 10/21/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 10/7/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen 1301 S. Ida Wichita, KS 67211 by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7018 0680 0001 8173 8714. (kf)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to stay service of process pending the District Court's review of the Report and Recommendation filed simultaneously here (ECF No. 6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 10/7/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen 1301 S. Ida Wichita, KS 67211 by regular mail. (kf)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 10/04/2021. Mailed to pro se party Mike Allen by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(mig)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mike Allen. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) (jsh)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Mike Allen. (jsh)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Topeka, filed by Mike Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Evergy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evergy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?