McVey v. Purvis et al
Larry McVey |
Andrea Purvis, Charleton F. Huen, Grant Pratt and Angelo Panas |
5:2022cv03040 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Sam A Crow |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until May 2, 2022, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until May 2, 2022, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/05/22. Mailed to pro se party Larry McVey by regular mail. (smnd) |
|
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Larry McVey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mailed to pro se party Larry McVey by regular mail. Response deadline 4/4/2022. (jal) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Larry McVey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Larry McVey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits in Support, #2 Envelopes) (jal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.