Williams (ID 103412) v. Dalton et al
| Destney Williams |
| Hartpence Dalton, Erica Marshall, Holly Chavez, Dona Hook, Gloria Geither and Meghan Davis |
| 5:2022cv03058 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 APPEAL DOCKETED in 10CCA on May 24, 2022, and assigned Appeal No. 22-3096 re #16 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Destney Williams. (smnd) |
| Filing 17 PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA re #16 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Packet) (smnd) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #14 Memorandum and Order and #15 Judgment by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| APPEAL FEE STATUS: filing fee not paid re: Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment #16 on behalf of Plaintiff Destney Williams. (THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY-NO DOCUMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION.) (smnd) |
| Filing 15 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #14 dismissing complaint with prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 05/18/22. Mailed to pro se party Destney Williams by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's complaint (ECF#1 ) is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief for the reasons stated in the court's screening order (ECF# 7). Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/18/22. Mailed to pro se party Destney Williams by regular mail. (smnd) |
| PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 5/6/2022. Receipt number T4631015764, in the amount of $402.00. See preceding DOCKET ANNOTATION for details. (jsh) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: The Order 9 filed 05/03/22 granted plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assessed an initial partial filing fee of $30.50. On this date, payment in the amount of $402.00 was received. The overpayment of $52.00 will be refunded to plaintiff. (smnd) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF#10 ) is denied, and the plaintiff's supplements (ECF#11 and #12 ) are not proper responses to the court's order of April 21, 2022, (ECF#7 ) and will not be considered for that purpose. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/05/22. Mailed to pro se party Destney Williams by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (smnd) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (smnd) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (smnd) |
Filing 9
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #5 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $30.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including May 17, 2022, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/03/22. Mailed to pro se party Destney Williams by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (smnd) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until May 13, 2022, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why her complaint should not be dismissed, and is also granted until May 13, 2022, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint curing all the deficiencies. Plaintiff's failure to file a good-cause response and/or her amended complaint by May 13, 2022, will result in the court deciding this matter based upon the current deficient complaint and dismissing without further notice. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF#2 ) is denied. Plaintiff's motion to proceed ifp (ECF#5 ) remains pending for compliance with the requirements by May 2, 2022. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/21/22. Mailed to pro se party Desteny Williams by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (smnd) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (Attachments: #1 KDOC Form 9 - Inmate Request to Staff Member) (smnd) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #3 Notice of Deficiency by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Destney Williams by regular mail. Response deadline 5/2/2022. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Destney Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
