Bautista v. USP Leavenworth Medical Staff
| Ismael Cobos Bautista |
| USP Leavenworth Medical Staff, (fnu) Hudson, Jane Doe (1) and Jane Doe (2) |
| 5:2022cv03065 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against (fnu) Hudson, Jane Doe (1) and Jane Doe (2) filed by Plaintiff Ismael Cobos Bautista. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 10
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to set aside the filing fee (Doc. No. #9 ) shall be denied. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 06/01/22. Mailed to pro se party Ismael Cobos Bautista by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Set Aside Filing Fee by Plaintiff Ismael Cobos Bautista. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ENTERED: The court grants plaintiff time until June 17, 2022, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or to file an amended complaint which corrects the deficiencies found in the original complaint. An amended complaint should be printed on forms supplied by the Clerk of the Court which may be supplemented. Failure to respond to this order may result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/24/22. Mailed to pro se party Ismael Cobos Bautista by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $25.00 calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including June 6, 2022, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/23/22. Mailed to pro se party Ismael Cobos Bautista by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ismael Cobos Bautista. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Ismael Cobos Bautista by regular mail. Response deadline 5/23/2022. (smnd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ismael Cobos Bautista. (smnd) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT (on court-approved form) filed by Plaintiff Ismael Cobos Bautista. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Ismael Cobos Bautista by regular mail. Response deadline 5/9/2022. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ismael Cobos Bautista. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
