Wicks v. Winger et al
Plaintiff: Bradley A. Wicks
Defendant: Angela Tolbosh Winger, Tim Weaver, Bryant Evans and Max Bryant
Case Number: 5:2022cv03107
Filed: May 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2022 Filing 12 RETURN Mail received re #6 Order and #7 Judgment addressed to Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks (Return to Sender/No Longer in Custody); Remailed to Plaintiff Wicks on 06/22/22 at Harvey County Detention Center. (smnd)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #10 ) is denied. The Clerk shall provide Plaintiff with a copy of Docs. 4, 6 and 7 at his current address at the Harvey County Detention Center. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 06/22/22. Mailed to pro se party Bradley A. Wicks by regular mail. (smnd)
June 21, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
June 21, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks: now at Harvey County Detention Center, 120 E. 7th Street, Newton, Kansas 67114. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
June 17, 2022 Filing 8 RETURN Mail received re 3 Order addressed to Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks. Not Remailed. (jal)
June 17, 2022 Filing 7 JUDGMENT ENTERED: re #6 Order dismissing this matter. Signed by deputy clerk on 6/17/2022. Mailed to pro se party Bradley A. Wicks by regular mail. (jal)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/17/2022. Mailed to pro se party Bradley A. Wicks by regular mail. (jal)
June 16, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN Mail received re #4 Memorandum & Order to Show Cause, addressed to Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks. Not Remailed. (jal)
June 1, 2022 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted until July 1, 2022, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why Plaintiff's Complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff is also granted until July 1, 2022, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. Signed by Senior U.S. District Judge Sam A. Crow on 06/01/22. Mailed to pro se party Bradley A. Wicks by regular mail. (smnd)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $124.00, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including June 14, 2022, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/31/22. Mailed to pro se party Bradley A. Wicks by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
May 26, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd)
May 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Bradley A. Wicks. (Attachments: #1 Declarations, #2 Exhibits A-J, #3 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wicks v. Winger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley A. Wicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Tolbosh Winger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryant Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Max Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?