Williams v. Larned State Hospital
| Kirk Franklin Williams and Kirk Franklin Williams-Bey |
| Larned State Hospital |
| 5:2022cv03206 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| James P O'Hara |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is provisionally granted. Petitioner is granted until December 5, 2022, in which to show good cause why the Petition should not be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/04/22. Mailed to pro se party Kirk Franklin Williams by regular mail. (smnd)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Kirk Franklin Williams by regular mail. Response deadline 10/24/2022. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Kirk Franklin Williams (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Kirk Franklin Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
