Romero (ID 127925) v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
Plaintiff: John Ryan Romero
Defendant: Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Gwen Summers
Case Number: 5:2022cv03235
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Referring Judge: James P O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN mail received re #5 Memorandum and Order and #6 Judgment addressed to John Ryan Romero (Return to Sender); Remailed to Plaintiff Romero at El Dorado Correctional Facility. (smnd)
December 1, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Pursuant to the Kansas Department of Corrections, Plaintiff John Ryan Romero has been at El Dorado Correctional Facility since November 8, 2022. Accordingly, his address has been updated on the docket sheet. (smnd)
November 17, 2022 Filing 6 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #5 dismissing matter. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/17/22. Mailed to pro se party John Ryan Romero by regular mail. (smnd)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/17/22. Mailed to pro se party John Ryan Romero by regular mail. (smnd)
November 17, 2022 MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ss)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: On or before November 10, 2022, plaintiff shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for the reasons discussed herein. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 10/17/2022. Mailed to pro se party John Ryan Romero by regular mail. (jal)
October 7, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Response deadline 11/7/2022. Mailed to pro se party John Ryan Romero by regular mail. (jal)
October 7, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff John Ryan Romero. (jal)
October 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff John Ryan Romero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Address Notice, #3 Envelope) (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero (ID 127925) v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Ryan Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gwen Summers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?