Maier v. Bureau of Consular Affairs et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Coty Maier
Defendant: Bureau of Consular Affairs, United States Department of State and National Counter Terrorism Center
Case Number: 5:2022cv03237
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Lungstrum
Referring Judge: James P O'Hara
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2022 Filing 19 RETURN mail received re #18 Order addressed to Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier (Return to Sender/Refused by Jail); Remailed to Plaintiff Maier at 944 Kentucky Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 (Current Address in Case No. 22-3286-JWL-JPO). (smnd)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ENTERED: This case remains closed and the Court will not be taking any action on submissions filed or emailed after this case was closed. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/21/22. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Coty Maier by regular mail. (smnd)
November 18, 2022 Filing 17 DECLARATION (missing page 15) by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd)
November 18, 2022 Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 18, 2022 Filing 15 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 8, 2022 Filing 14 JUDGMENT regarding Order #13 dismissing action without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/08/22. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Coty Maier by regular mail. (smnd)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff's motions (Docs. #4 , #5 , #6 , #7 , #8 and #9 ) are denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/08/22. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Coty Maier by regular mail. (smnd)
November 7, 2022 Filing 12 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 7, 2022 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Default Judgment by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 7, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE to the United States District Court by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 7, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Issuance of Subpoenas by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
November 7, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Special Master by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
October 24, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Orders by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)
October 24, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE for Neglect to Prevent by Affidavit by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)
October 24, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Receipt and Deposit by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)
October 24, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. Plaintiff is granted until November 4, 2022, to submit the $402.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/11/22. Mailed to pro se party Christopher Coty Maier by regular mail. (smnd)
October 11, 2022 MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ss)
October 7, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (jal)
October 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Christopher Coty Maier. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maier v. Bureau of Consular Affairs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Coty Maier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Consular Affairs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Counter Terrorism Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?