McMillan (ID 111775) v. Alexander et al
Pettix McMillan |
Byron Alexander, James Skidmore, (fnu) (lnu) (1), Centurion Health Services, (fnu) Tilson, Bryan Wilson, (fnu) Karry, Britt Butler, Kim Tilson and Bera Karry |
5:2022cv03278 |
October 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Lungstrum |
James P O'Hara |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Pettix McMillan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (smnd) |
Filing 8 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Doc. #7 ) is granted. Plaintiff is granted to and including December 29, 2022 in which to file his amended complaint on court-approved forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/29/22. Mailed to pro se party Pettix McMillan by regular mail with court-approved forms. (smnd) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Pettix McMillan (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (smnd) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 11/21/2022. Receipt number 500000227, in the amount of $ 17.50. (jal) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion (Doc. #5 ) is granted. Plaintiff is granted to and including December 9, 2022, to submit the initial partial filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/07/22. Mailed to pro se party Pettix McMillan by regular mail. (smnd) Modified text on 11/8/22. (smnd) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee (titled Motion to Object) by Plaintiff Pettix McMillan (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including November 29, 2022, to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies. The clerk is directed to send 1983 forms and instructions to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 10/28/22. Mailed to pro se party Pettix McMillan by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $17.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted to and including November 9, 2022, to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 10/26/22. Mailed to pro se party Pettix McMillan by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Pettix McMillan (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Pettix McMillan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.